we have already answered
as
RiL. Bowen's remarks in
من 2
2
(
Jac ded by the Attorney
To his being
Jun
being guided funeral in one disp: 20.147-25
on for. 10169-
e
has le
thinking that hi
'Malley', openings little unfairly toward that gentleman, in his devic
J. Bowen forward,
make a case as
complaints
In the presen
wally
to quation
his desce to pinion
aish this Afte
Offic
Out his
we cannot answer Sie for Bowens categorically remarks in fax. 5 require Me refly, & dwould say some thing, to the effect that way
By
Silly
to
their to ill and necessary
it
to notice the comments mentioned
by Mi! Bowen
VA
For the misfeession
wifeen is
which he
Exists
appear:
affeses to Kejs
fd, the
on which is to batent
acquiring owly can scarcely credit that Lord July
Her in
no
An
it
A
wer a question zhit as
which hite misled. the grounen neglect te the Regul
Instructions
Ew
X
* They do
hot demo more retice
than the Pavings f
Wit newspapers
a
* I
Ah 4
it's reality,
8
which
in any
443
uistarn
have come to hi
which way have
1. Power's notice he will
doubtless have quite removed?
The amendments suggested
have been introduced,
tir o
Desp
& Iresume that both Ordinances will now be sanctioned.
It seems that the peoper formalities had been more fully carried out than we uffered, & Hat Sie J. Bower-
-
hes this regarded the Certificate
obsolete formality.
after thought.
its
صحنه مه
? Sanction the live bedinam
ray that Lord July when the
hold
glad to
learn that although all the presbibed formalities were not fully carried out, b
Doves
which dief. Kreasons which,
foudrea
Bowel has now explained, the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.